Choctaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,426,789 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 37.5 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $89,100, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $103,705, a difference of 26.0%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $45,220, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.7%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $55,712, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,680, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 39.0%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 20.6%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 41.5%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.3%).