Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,990,126 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 214.7 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,416, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $89,100, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $55,712, a difference of 0.60%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $47,617, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $103,705, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.62%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 0.15%), college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.1%).