Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,108,217 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $45,220, a difference of 26.0%), median family income ($88,358 compared to $106,453, a difference of 20.5%), and median household income ($74,112 compared to $89,100, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $40,297, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $53,680, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($41,263 compared to $47,617, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.30%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.7%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 9th grade (93.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 7th grade (94.5% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.52%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%).