Apache vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,431,048 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.154% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 154.3 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,886 compared to $45,220, a difference of 29.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $103,705, a difference of 26.2%), and median family income ($84,451 compared to $106,453, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $53,680, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $40,297, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 78.3%), single male poverty (21.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 73.9%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 75.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 64.6%), and male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 30.4%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.46 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.8%), bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.19%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 75.0%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 11.6%).