Canadian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,002,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.375% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 374.8 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $64,416, a difference of 3.5%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $55,712, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $97,623, a difference of 0.0%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $106,453, a difference of 0.14%), and median earnings ($47,911 compared to $47,617, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.70%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.0%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%).