Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,118,451 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($42,868 compared to $40,297, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($88,463 compared to $89,100, a difference of 0.72%), householder income over 65 years ($65,038 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.97%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,427 compared to $103,705, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.2%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.13%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.4%), bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and associate's degree (47.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.2%), male disability (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%).