Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from Oceania

Fair
Average
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,640,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $45,220, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $103,705, a difference of 13.5%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $89,100, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $40,297, a difference of 6.0%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $47,617, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $53,680, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Average
25.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Good
11.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
82.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Excellent
30.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Fair
2.5%