Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,367,065 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 36.2 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,220, a difference of 47.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,705, a difference of 41.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $89,100, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,297, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,623, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 127.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 110.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 133.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 69.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 68.4%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 61.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.27%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 61.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.5%).