Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Immigrants from Oceania

Exceptional
Average
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,084,776 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 17.2 Immigrants from Oceania.
Bhutanese Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $103,705, a difference of 13.5%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $106,453, a difference of 12.5%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $89,100, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $40,297, a difference of 8.3%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Average
25.6%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 27.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.2%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
8.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
11.4%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.3%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.89%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.1%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
30.6%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.69%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
2.5%