Austrian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,177,445 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 80.4 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.8%), median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $55,712, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($48,116 compared to $45,220, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $40,297, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($91,339 compared to $89,100, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.8%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.7%), no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.3%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.90%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%).