Apache vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,321,833 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.045% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 1,045.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $71,021, a difference of 29.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $105,149, a difference of 27.9%), and median household income ($70,927 compared to $89,919, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $38,461, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($40,388 compared to $45,027, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 93.4%), family poverty (14.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 77.3%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.7%), single female poverty (27.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 39.1%), and receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.7%), and male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.46 compared to 3.43, a difference of 1.0%), family households (66.5% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.9%), associate's degree (36.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 51.0%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.5%), female disability (13.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 10.9%).