Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,321,025 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Bulgaria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bulgaria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.119% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bulgaria corresponds to a decrease of 119.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,482 compared to $41,017, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($60,358 compared to $52,306, a difference of 15.4%), and median earnings ($51,318 compared to $45,027, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,305 compared to $55,158, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($93,148 compared to $89,919, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 31.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.0%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.2%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.040%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 71.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 49.2%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.0%).