Pima vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,192,636 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $105,149, a difference of 43.3%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $89,919, a difference of 42.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $71,021, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,158, a difference of 7.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,461, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,058, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 146.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 137.1%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 120.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 47.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 137.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 119.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 50.1%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 83.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 43.1%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 42.7%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 60.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.0%).