U.S. Virgin Islander vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,230,671 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 21.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $71,021, a difference of 36.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $105,149, a difference of 27.1%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $89,919, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $38,461, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($41,448 compared to $45,027, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($37,589 compared to $41,017, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 52.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 14.5%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.7%), married-couple households (39.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and currently married (40.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.43, a difference of 4.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 102.2%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 100.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 62.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.2%).