Immigrants from Jordan vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,085,609 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 86.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $71,021, a difference of 12.7%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $41,017, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $52,306, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,412 compared to $89,919, a difference of 0.57%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $105,149, a difference of 0.96%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $95,058, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.51%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.56%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 18.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.65%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.96%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.6%).