Czechoslovakian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,861,539 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 120.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $71,021, a difference of 17.2%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $55,158, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.72%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $104,910, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.13 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.50%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.92%).