Bhutanese vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,509,801 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.419% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 419.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $41,017, a difference of 21.6%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $52,306, a difference of 18.1%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $45,027, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $71,021, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $55,158, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.68%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 23.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.8%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 43.0%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%).