Choctaw vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,087,221 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $71,021, a difference of 33.9%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $89,919, a difference of 28.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $105,149, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $52,306, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $45,027, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 45.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 40.2%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.21%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.8%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and associate's degree (37.8% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.5%).