Crow vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,321,308 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $71,021, a difference of 44.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $105,149, a difference of 41.6%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $89,919, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,461, a difference of 9.1%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $45,027, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $55,158, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 106.5%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 93.8%), and single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 58.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 212.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 212.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 209.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.8%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.43, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.5%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.14%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.6%).