Canadian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 292,354,228 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 50.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $71,021, a difference of 14.1%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $41,017, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $105,149, a difference of 0.56%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $104,910, a difference of 1.6%), and median household income ($87,769 compared to $89,919, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.5%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.90%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.30%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.56%).