Immigrants from Norway vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,644,491 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to a decrease of 25.6 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $41,017, a difference of 27.3%), median male earnings ($61,628 compared to $52,306, a difference of 17.8%), and median earnings ($51,758 compared to $45,027, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($94,846 compared to $89,919, a difference of 5.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $105,149, a difference of 6.2%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.1%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), currently married (47.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.4%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 58.0%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 53.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.2%), male disability (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.8%).