Crow vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,258,783 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.455% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 455.3 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $41,195, a difference of 29.8%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $80,341, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $89,673, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,644, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $54,030, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,722, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 85.8%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 85.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 73.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 199.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 197.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 188.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.7%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 115.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 83.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 17.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 67.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.2%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.0%), college, under 1 year (60.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 68.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%).