U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,580,861 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 103.6 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $89,673, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $53,722, a difference of 13.2%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $80,341, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $54,030, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $38,644, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 17.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.3%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.88%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 54.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.1% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.7%).