Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Immigrants from Ecuador

Exceptional
Poor
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,425,366 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.476. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Bhutanese Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $54,030, a difference of 33.8%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $92,837, a difference of 29.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $91,462, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,722, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $38,644, a difference of 13.0%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $44,462, a difference of 17.6%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.5%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 64.8%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 63.2%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.3%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.0%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.1%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.9%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.2%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.1%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.2%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
33.7%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 173.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 84.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 66.0%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
4.2%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.8%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%