Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,901,337 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $53,722, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $89,673, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $54,030, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $50,474, a difference of 0.13%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $38,644, a difference of 0.66%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $44,462, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and female unemployment (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 8.6%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.53%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (42.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 95.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 34.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%).