Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,474,936 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $41,195, a difference of 14.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $53,722, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,363 compared to $89,673, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $54,030, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($88,358 compared to $92,837, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and single mother poverty (31.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 36.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.3%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (30.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.87%), currently married (43.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 175.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 78.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 29.6%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (95.9% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.080%), 4th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 3rd grade (96.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.2%).