Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,165,596 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $41,195, a difference of 21.4%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $38,644, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $89,673, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $54,030, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $53,722, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $91,462, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (25.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.75%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.76%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.0%), family households with children (31.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (44.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 192.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 112.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 83.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 20.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 83.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 45.9%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 43.9%), and bachelor's degree (26.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%).