Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,638,532 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 72.9 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.9%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $54,030, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $91,462, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $53,722, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $38,644, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $89,673, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.0%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.37%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.4%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.32%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 175.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.4%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%).