Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Finnish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Finns

Immigrants from Ecuador

Good
Poor
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Finnish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,354,882 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Finnish Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 27.2%), median family income ($102,676 compared to $92,837, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $54,030, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $38,644, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($45,940 compared to $44,462, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $53,722, a difference of 3.7%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,461
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Average
$102,676
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,607
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,940
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,721
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,173
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,827
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,610
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$99,904
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,535
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
22.5%

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 62.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 53.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.0%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.0%

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.8%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 41.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.9%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.7%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Tragic
82.2%

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.4%), currently married (48.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.1%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.09
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Tragic
33.7%

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 210.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 72.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 66.3%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.3%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
4.2%

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and college, under 1 year (66.9% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.7%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Finnish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricFinnishImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%