Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,820,979 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to a decrease of 38.4 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,137 compared to $92,837, a difference of 18.6%), per capita income ($48,747 compared to $41,195, a difference of 18.3%), and median male earnings ($59,278 compared to $50,474, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $53,722, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $38,644, a difference of 9.7%), and median earnings ($50,225 compared to $44,462, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.2%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 75.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 13.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.0%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.4%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.71%).