Palestinian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,811,221 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Palestinian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Palestinians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Palestinians corresponds to a decrease of 48.0 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,800 compared to $54,030, a difference of 18.1%), median family income ($109,413 compared to $92,837, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,721 compared to $91,462, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,515 compared to $53,722, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($41,484 compared to $38,644, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,777 compared to $89,673, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 44.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.7%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 186.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 20.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 60.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.3%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.3%).