Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from Ecuador

Fair
Poor
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,844,047 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 44.2 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $53,722, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $54,030, a difference of 5.7%), and per capita income ($39,827 compared to $41,195, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $91,462, a difference of 0.080%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $50,474, a difference of 0.35%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $44,462, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
22.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.42%), poverty (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
15.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 35.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.1%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.95%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
33.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 128.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 33.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
4.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.7%), college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.94%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%