Arapaho vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Cherokee
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,440,561 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Cherokee.
Arapaho vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.8%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $48,669, a difference of 16.6%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $37,203, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $72,682, a difference of 6.9%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $88,209, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $47,848, a difference of 8.7%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 27.4% |
Arapaho vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.6%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.4%), single female poverty (26.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Arapaho vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 104.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 102.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 101.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Arapaho vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Arapaho vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.5%), currently married (40.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.18, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 36.7% |
Arapaho vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Arapaho vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.5%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Arapaho vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Cherokee |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |