Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Cherokee

Poor
Fair
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,330,335 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.112% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 111.9 Cherokee.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.9%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $34,742, a difference of 17.9%), and per capita income ($41,655 compared to $37,203, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $54,133, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($51,446 compared to $48,669, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $86,125, a difference of 6.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
27.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), poverty (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and female poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
13.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 30.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
79.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.6%), married-couple households (40.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.56%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
36.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 207.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 82.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 46.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
7.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.4%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.98%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCherokee
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%