Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Cherokee

Exceptional
Fair
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,583,781 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 31.6 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $37,203, a difference of 27.4%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $88,209, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $72,682, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $47,848, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $54,133, a difference of 17.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 37.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (46.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.0%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.1%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.4%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%