Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Cherokee

Good
Fair
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 337,271,516 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.812. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.467% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 467.2 Cherokee.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $37,203, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $86,125, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $80,843, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,848, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $34,742, a difference of 11.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.5%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 15.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
36.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 27.8%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%