Bhutanese vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Cherokee

Exceptional
Fair
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,851,591 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Cherokee.
Bhutanese Integration in Cherokee Communities

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($100,151 compared to $72,682, a difference of 37.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $86,125, a difference of 36.7%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $88,209, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $47,848, a difference of 19.3%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $34,742, a difference of 25.6%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricBhutaneseCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 62.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 56.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.6%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.2%

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
79.0%

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 31.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
36.7%

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.75%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.8%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Bhutanese vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%).
Bhutanese vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%