Romanian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Cherokee

Excellent
Fair
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 345,179,111 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.789. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.314% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 313.8 Cherokee.
Romanian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Romanian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $37,203, a difference of 30.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $80,843, a difference of 26.8%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $72,682, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $47,848, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $54,133, a difference of 18.5%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricRomanianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Romanian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 35.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 18.7%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.2%

Romanian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Romanian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Romanian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 27.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianCherokee
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
36.7%

Romanian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.1%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Romanian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.4%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Romanian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.3%).
Romanian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricRomanianCherokee
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%