Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Cherokee

Fair
Fair
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,476,155 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 20.0 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.0%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $34,742, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $72,682, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $47,848, a difference of 1.9%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $48,669, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $54,133, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 33.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.1%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 80.8%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCherokee
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%