Colville vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,457,459 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 28.8%), median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $34,742, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,739 compared to $54,133, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,516 compared to $48,669, a difference of 0.32%), median earnings ($42,151 compared to $41,252, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,604 compared to $80,843, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 38.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (21.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 65.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 59.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%), births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 76.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 85.4%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.5%).