Uruguayan vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Uruguayan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Uruguayans

Cherokee

Average
Fair
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Uruguayan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,424,882 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.333% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 332.7 Cherokee.
Uruguayan Integration in Cherokee Communities

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $37,203, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $72,682, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $80,843, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $54,133, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $47,848, a difference of 9.7%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricUruguayanCherokee
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,318
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,656
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Average
$84,691
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Average
$46,190
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,680
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,228
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,465
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,631
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,660
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,090
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricUruguayanCherokee
Poverty
Average
12.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Fair
13.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUruguayanCherokee
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUruguayanCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.9%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Tragic
79.0%

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUruguayanCherokee
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.5%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.6%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.1%
Tragic
36.7%

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.1%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUruguayanCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricUruguayanCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.8%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.5%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Uruguayan vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.1%).
Uruguayan vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricUruguayanCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%