Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,829,132 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.348% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 348.3 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $37,203, a difference of 39.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $80,843, a difference of 32.2%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $88,209, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.52%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $54,133, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 46.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 41.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 29.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (63.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 76.7%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 63.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 55.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%).