Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belarus

Cherokee

Good
Fair
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,742,693 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $37,203, a difference of 35.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $80,843, a difference of 32.8%), and median family income ($114,586 compared to $88,209, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $54,133, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $47,848, a difference of 16.5%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,303
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,586
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,399
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,043
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,658
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,757
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,743
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,393
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,430
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,162
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 48.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.4%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 43.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.35%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 116.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 10.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 48.1%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.9%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.0%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 66.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.3%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.2%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 59.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelarusCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%