Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,368,837 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 77.7 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $72,288, a difference of 13.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $117,750, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $100,151, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $43,648, a difference of 5.1%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $49,894, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.1%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.79%).