Romanian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Bhutanese

Excellent
Exceptional
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bhutanese Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 344,320,673 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Bhutanese.
Romanian Integration in Bhutanese Communities

Romanian vs Bhutanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $72,288, a difference of 12.7%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $100,151, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $117,750, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $61,759, a difference of 2.8%), per capita income ($48,445 compared to $49,894, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Income
Income MetricRomanianBhutanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$49,894
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Exceptional
$119,800
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$100,151
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$52,297
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Exceptional
$61,759
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Exceptional
$43,648
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$57,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$109,520
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$117,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Exceptional
$72,288
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.0%

Romanian vs Bhutanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianBhutanese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
12.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
25.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%

Romanian vs Bhutanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianBhutanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Romanian vs Bhutanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianBhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Excellent
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Romanian vs Bhutanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianBhutanese
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Romanian vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.9%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.2%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianBhutanese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Romanian vs Bhutanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.3%), college, 1 year or more (62.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and associate's degree (49.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianBhutanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Exceptional
42.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Romanian vs Bhutanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Romanian vs Bhutanese Disability
Disability MetricRomanianBhutanese
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%