Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,748,481 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.109% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 109.2 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $117,750, a difference of 28.8%), median household income ($78,682 compared to $100,151, a difference of 27.3%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $119,800, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $43,648, a difference of 14.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $57,078, a difference of 17.1%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 54.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 54.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.9%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%).