Czechoslovakian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,369,106 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.092% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 1,091.7 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $72,288, a difference of 19.3%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $100,151, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $117,750, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $57,078, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $61,759, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.3%).