Hungarian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 418,314,898 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 23.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $72,288, a difference of 17.2%), median household income ($86,920 compared to $100,151, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $57,078, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.6%), median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $61,759, a difference of 7.8%), and median earnings ($47,795 compared to $52,297, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.38%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.9%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.13%), 11th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%).