Luxembourger vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,346,939 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 92.8 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $72,288, a difference of 18.6%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $100,151, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $117,750, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $49,894, a difference of 9.3%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $43,648, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.6%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.7%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.6%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.98%), currently married (49.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 62.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.48%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%).