Immigrants from Belarus vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,993,734 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.152% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 151.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $72,288, a difference of 16.3%), median household income ($94,399 compared to $100,151, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $117,750, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,303 compared to $49,894, a difference of 0.82%), median earnings ($53,043 compared to $52,297, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $61,759, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.33%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), currently married (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 92.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 64.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.9%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%).